Refutation: The Story of Bigger Thomas ( Native Son ) :: essays research papers

In Darryl Pinckneys discerning critical essay, Richard Wright The Unnatural History of a ingrained Son, Pinckney states that all of Wrights books contain the themes of violence, in humanityity, rage, and fear. Wright writes about these themes because he expresses, in his books, his convictions about his own struggles with racial oppression, the brutal realities of his early life. Pinckney claims that Wrights works are queer for Wrights works did not attempt to incite whites to acknowledge blacks. Wright does not write to preach that blacks are equal to whites. The characters in Wrights works, including Bigger doubting Thomas from autochthonic Son, are not all pure in heart the characters have psychological burdens and act upon their burdens. For instance, Bigger Thomas, long under racial oppression, out of the blue suffocates Mary Dalton in her room for fear that he will be discriminated against and charged with the rape of Mary Dalton. Also, according to Pinckney, although the characters of Wrights books are under these psychological burdens, they always have futile hopes and desires. At the end of Native Son, Bigger is enlightened by the way his lawyer Max treats him, with the respect of a human being. Bigger then desires nothing but to live, but he has been sentenced to death.Although Pinckney expresses many strong points in his critical essay, he also reveals weak points. For example, Pinckney mentions that Wright is neither a black leader such as Malcolm X nor a writer with any strong background in American literature, yet Pinckney implicitly states that Wright is a great writer and that one must analyze his past to understand how he is a great writer. In that perspective, he also commends Wrights book, Native Son. He statesNative Son is unmatched in its powerIt is not true as Baldwin claims that Bigger Thomas, the doomed, frustrated black boy, is just another classextreme in his wish to injure himself and do injury to othersPinckney praises Native S on as a powerful intellectual book that deals with issues of racism and oppression. He says explicitly that it is the most powerful book, but it is unclear what domain of books Pinckney is comparing Native Son with. Pinckney refutes James Baldwins statement about Native Son, maxim that Bigger Thomas is not a mere stereotype, but an example of a stressed black boy of the racially segregated American beau monde during the 1930s. It is true that Bigger Thomas is a victim of a racially segregated society.