Is Human Cloning Another Frankenstein Essay - 1272 Words

Is Human Cloning Another Frankenstein? nbsp; The creation of life by unnatural method is a question that Mary Shelleys Frankenstein addresses. Through the events that result from Victors attempt to bestow life to the inanimate, Shelley concludes that it is inappropriate for man to play god. With the advent of the science of creation, cloning, scientists now face the same problem that Shelley raised years ago. The applications of such research are numerous, all varying in severity. In what way the users for cloning are developed and performed is of much debate. Unfortunately, there is no absolute answer for the issue. nbsp; A popular suggestion is to develop cloning technology for medical use on humans. The creation of†¦show more content†¦The United States however has no national biomedical regulatory bodies. Therefore, the current system relies on independent groups such as hospital review boards to make policies regarding cloning. In order to make such policy making organizations effective, some guidelines and levels of authority must be developed. Current regulations make it illegal for government funding to be used for human cloning research. No limitations are made on privately funded studies, which is where the dilemma arises. There is no way to monitor private companies and therefore any limitations on human cloning would be useless. Thus, a national regulatory board will only be effective for public research projects. Despite possible ways around a regulatory commission, a live body would be able to adapt to new developments in technology and make concurrent adjustments to existing law s. A bioethics committee allows the most flexible way to regulate human cloning. nbsp; Another solution available is an outright ban on human cloning research. President Clinton and existing ethics groups have insisted in such a ban, but Congress has yet to seriously consider the issue. Richard Seed has announced that he and his team intend to clone a human before the procedure is banned. Those near Mr. Seed believe that he has the means to complete his project and the only question is when it happens. Seeds aim is to help couples who cannot have their own child byShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Leon Kasss The Wisdom Of Repugnance811 Words   |  4 Pagesthe dangers of cloning and why we should not pursue the idea of it. Kass starts out by stating that Joshua Lederberg, one of the major contributors to the idea of cloning, has an amoral view to â€Å"this morally weighty subject†( Kass 17). We have been softened up on the idea of cloning because of how cloning has made its way into our daily lives; although it may be subtle, it can easily slip into our minds and s often us up to see cloning is moral when it is amoral. We have taken cloning so far that itRead MoreThe Consequences Of Cloning In Frankenstein By Mary Shelley1470 Words   |  6 PagesThe invention of cloning, both a blessing and a curse, can possibly enable humanity to reach eternal life. An invention is the creation of a device developed after a study or an experiment, in the hopes of benefiting society. The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is about an inventor, Victor Frankenstein, who creates life that he later rejects. His invention results in consequences for both himself and his creation. Both cloning and the creation of the monster was made to benefit and advance society’sRead MoreWhat is Cloning?931 Words   |  4 PagesCloning today holds a position of one of the most sought after inventions to cure humanity from organ failure and diseases. Scientists are working towards the elimination of human problems in the medical field and advancing in research so that i mmortality will one day be attainable. This could be a significant breakthrough for the human race, however dabbling in artificial creation remains unhealthy and factitious. Just as cloning falls under the same pretence of unnatural and dangerous life, soRead MoreEssay about Creating Life by Cloning is Immoral1650 Words   |  7 PagesCreating Life by Cloning is Immoral The idea of creating life has intrigued people since the beginning of time. Mary Shelly in her novel Frankenstein brought this idea to life. In this novel, Victor Frankenstein created life by using advanced science and spare body parts. The idea of creating life is a current controversy. Technology now allows for the cloning of sheep. Certainly, the ability to clone humans cannot be far away. It is necessary to place restrictions on cloning research and toRead MoreHuman and Important Cautionary Guide Essay1078 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction to Frankenstein Mary Shelley The ethical debate concerning biotechnological exploration into genetic cloning has created a monster in itself. A multitude of ethical questions arises when considering the effect of creating a genetically engineered human being. Does man or science have the right to create life through unnatural means? Should morality dictate these technological advancements and their effects on society? The questions and concerns are infinite, but so to are the curiositiesRead MoreHuman Cloning Debate: The Fate of Frankenstein1671 Words   |  7 PagesBackground When Frankenstein was adapted for stage in 1823 the productions title was Presumption; or, The Fate of Frankenstein. A Victorian audience was concerned with the theme of a mans ambition to replace God by creating a new species. Equal emphasis was placed on this aspect of the novel in the 1831 introduction of Frankenstein, It is Mary Shellys critique of where such highly abstracted creative powers can lead when put in a realizing scientifi c context and then driven along by loftyRead MoreResponsibility and The Dangers of Science in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley1110 Words   |  5 Pagesactually killed her. Who knows what might have happened had Victor taken care of the creature like he should have. It could have lead to many different kinds of new studies and discoveries about human life and death. The recipe for immortality could have been discovered and no one would have to suffer at all. Another part of this theme is the dangers of science. Victor knew that he was getting into a territory that had not yet been mapped. There were no other scientists who did anything in that area inRead MoreFrankenstein by Mary Shelley1093 Words   |  4 Pagesimprovements are necessary, harmful, or important. Some can argue that these advancements can be harmful, and that technology is moving faster than man can contend with. That argument is the premises, moral, and plot base for Mary Shelleys tale Frankenstein. On the other hand, J. Michael Bishops, essay Enemies of Promise   on the other hand promotes and boast sciences achievements. However, Mary Shelley presents her point of view subtly yet very dramatically, which is much more effective than thatRead MoreAnalysis Of Mary Shelley s Frankenstein1575 Words   |  7 PagesMary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a story full of ideas that are ahead of her time. In 1818, Shelley published her novel, and her work opened up endless p ossibilities in the field of both literature and medicine. In contrast, The Adoration of Jenna Fox asked the question that if we take current technology such as 3D-printing and project it into the near future in the medical field, what will it look like when everyone has a â€Å"replaceable 3D-printed† limb? Pearson’s novel acts like a cautionary tale forRead MoreThe Invention Of An Achievement And Left Alone983 Words   |  4 Pagescommonly known to people however, in 1928 a German scientist was the first to successfully clone a frog. Since that day in the early 1900’s scientist have progressively been making steps forward in cloning whether it be humans, animals or most recently stem cells. With all these advancements in cloning it leaves people with many uncertainties regarding the morality, results and ethics behind all of it. Regardless of the uncertainties science continues to proceed with studies and experiments; what